{"id":12923,"date":"2009-06-04T08:02:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-04T13:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/BrandTwist.com\/?p=31"},"modified":"2018-10-18T20:15:00","modified_gmt":"2018-10-18T20:15:00","slug":"threes-a-crowd","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/brandtwist.com\/blog\/risk-taking\/threes-a-crowd\/","title":{"rendered":"Three&#8217;s a Crowd?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/_8uAPsVQ1eAg\/SifHQQ8YYqI\/AAAAAAAAAPc\/OQfFDzA3_Hg\/s1600-h\/ges.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 126px; height: 84px;\" src=\"http:\/\/3.bp.blogspot.com\/_8uAPsVQ1eAg\/SifHQQ8YYqI\/AAAAAAAAAPc\/OQfFDzA3_Hg\/s320\/ges.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\"id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5343458565138440866\" \/><\/a><br \/>We all know three&#8217;s a crowd, but can crowds be the new answer to innovation?<\/p>\n<p>Yesterday I published a post on the right timing for creating, evaluating, and killing (if need be) new ideas.<\/p>\n<p>Thanks to one reader, Sara, I learned about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.quirky.com\/home\/about\">Quirky <\/a>a community from the creator of Mophie and Kluster set up as a way for people to expose their ideas to a larger groups and get feedback (all for $99 bucks).<\/p>\n<p>I think it&#8217;s worth checking out.<\/p>\n<p>My own experience with Crowd sourcing has been pretty positive to date. I used the website <a href=\"http:\/\/99designs.com\/\">99 Designs <\/a>to create my Brand Twist Logo. <\/p>\n<p>99 Designs let&#8217;s you launch contests to create branding elements (websites, logos, etc). You write a brief, pick a prize amount, and for 7 days designers from around the world bid on your contest by submitting designs. <\/p>\n<p>You have to keep giving feedback in order for your contest to stay healthy and attract the best talent. At the end of 7 days (some extensions allowed) you pick a winning design, release the money, and go through a file transfer to get the artwork.<\/p>\n<p>While I know this site is not without some controversy in the design community&#8230;particularly because the prices are very low (the average for a logo is $300) my experience was very positive. I felt it to be in many ways very similar to the traditional agency design process. <\/p>\n<p>Many of the submissions weren&#8217;t very good, but a lot were. And the journey of seeing what I liked and what I rejected helped me hone in on what Brand Twist means to me as a brand. The tag line I use &#8220;a fresh approach to new ideas&#8221; was also an added bonus, it was suggested by a designer- unsolicited.<\/p>\n<p>As in any design process, your output is only as good as your input so it was critical that I had a well thought out and well-written brief and that I gave continual, specific and constructive feedback to my designers.<\/p>\n<p>I ended up choosing a design and a designer that I created a bond with (albeit virtually). Like most great designers he brought me ideas that went beyond the original brief and that I really liked. He also made some strategic suggestions that helped me in deciding which way I wanted to go.<\/p>\n<p>The main difference, I guess, is that he was an anonymous face in the crowd and our whole relationship was virtual.<\/p>\n<p>Only after I awarded the job did I learn his name and that he live in Greece.<\/p>\n<p>Love it or hate it, I think crowd-sourcing for both evaluation (like Quirky) and creation (like 99 Designs) is here to stay. <\/p>\n<p>The question for me is not whether it&#8217;s good or evil, but how do we get the most value from it. Not in a monetary sense, but how can it best be leveraged to fruitfully further ideas.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s my point of view. What&#8217;s your twist?<\/p>\n<p>How are you using crowd-sourcing?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We all know three&#8217;s a crowd, but can crowds be the new answer to innovation? Yesterday I published a post on the right timing for creating, evaluating, and killing (if need be) new ideas. Thanks to one reader, Sara, I learned about Quirky a community from the creator of Mophie and Kluster set up as [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,56],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-12923","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-risk-taking","7":"category-social-media"},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/brandtwist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12923","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/brandtwist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/brandtwist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brandtwist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brandtwist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12923"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/brandtwist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12923\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16681,"href":"https:\/\/brandtwist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12923\/revisions\/16681"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/brandtwist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12923"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brandtwist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12923"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/brandtwist.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12923"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}